Temu and Shein are two major players in e-commerce, particularly dominating the fashion and clothing sectors in the U.S. These brands have achieved significant success in the U.S. due to their low prices. Their capacity to offer such low prices primarily relies on exploiting certain loopholes in the American market, thereby reducing operational costs and enabling competitive pricing.
This situation has become a primary concern for American businesses. The widespread availability of significantly low-priced products on platforms like Temu and Shein has resulted in considerable financial pressure on domestic companies, as evidenced by several plant closures and job losses in the textile industry. This could lead to negative impacts in the long term that will impact both the economy and consumers.
Understanding The Tax Advantage for Temu and Shein
Temu and Shein benefit from a specific trade rule called de minimis. This rule allows them to import goods valued at less than $800 into the U.S. without paying duties or taxes on those shipments. Not paying import tariffs gives them a significant cost advantage over traditional retailers, who must factor in these additional expenses when pricing their products.
As a result, Temu and Shein can offer products to consumers at very low prices, often undercutting competitors, thanks to their lowered operating costs. Their very low prices also shape consumer expectations regarding pricing, making it harder for their competitors to make sales. This tax advantage has contributed to their rapid growth and success in the e-commerce market, posing a threat to domestic businesses that cannot compete with their pricing strategy.
Impact on Consumers
Of course, consumers love getting products at the lowest possible price, but letting two companies dominate the market can create some negative effects in the long term. The dominance of Temu and Shein can lead to the closure of more small retailers in the U.S. and the loss of jobs in traditional retail sectors.
This leaves the market power to a few companies, which may limit consumer choice and competition, ultimately harming the long-term interests of consumers. The reliance on imported goods from overseas suppliers may also raise concerns about product quality, supply chain transparency, and ethical labor practices. These are crucial factors that some consumers consider while choosing a brand.
Final thoughts
Giving an advantage to companies like Temu and Shein using the de minimis rule makes it hard for American retail businesses to compete on price due to regulatory disparities. This disparity in tax treatment distorts market competition and undermines the level playing field essential for a healthy economy. There is an urgent need for legislation to address this issue and level the playing field for domestic businesses. A level playing field will allow more local retail businesses to thrive, ensuring competition and giving consumers more choices in the long run.
Follow us on Facebook and subscribe to the newsletter for more articles and stories.
